Vision/multimodal silently dropped with use_tokenizer_template on the python backends (sglang, vllm): images reach the engine but the prompt carries no media placeholder
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 49.2k
- Forks
- 4.5k
- Avg merge
- 1d 3m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 239
Description
LocalAI version
v4.7.1, image localai/localai:v4.7.1-nvidia-l4t-arm64-cuda-13.
Backends cuda13-nvidia-l4t-arm64-sglang (sglang 0.5.17) and cuda13-nvidia-l4t-arm64-vllm (vLLM 0.24.0), both from the gallery.
Environment, CPU architecture, OS, and Version
NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10, Blackwell sm_121), arm64, Ubuntu 24.04, CUDA 13, driver 595.71.05, Docker with the NVIDIA runtime.
Describe the bug
For a model configured with template.use_tokenizer_template: true, an image sent as an image_url content part is silently ignored. No error, no warning — the model simply answers as if no image had been attached. The same model, image and prompt work correctly when the engine is driven directly (standalone sglang.launch_server and its own /v1/chat/completions), so it is neither the model nor the engine.
The images do reach the backend. What does not reach it is the media placeholder in the prompt:
core/http/middleware/request.godecodes theimage_urlparts intoMessages[i].StringImages, and then — forUseTokenizerTemplate— deliberately writes only the text back intoStringContent:
// When the backend handles templating itself (UseTokenizerTemplate),
// it also injects media markers server-side (see
// oaicompat_chat_params_parse in llama.cpp). ...
if config.TemplateConfig.UseTokenizerTemplate {
input.Messages[i].StringContent = textContent
} else {
input.Messages[i].StringContent, _ = templates.TemplateMultiModal(...)
}
That assumption holds for llama.cpp's server, which injects the markers itself. It does not hold for the python backends: they call tokenizer.apply_chat_template() on plain string content, and a chat template only emits vision tokens when the content is a list of parts.
-
core/schema/message.go(Messages.ToProto()) then drops the image parts entirely and keeps only the concatenated.text. -
message Messageinbackend.protohas no media field at all, so images can only travel out-of-band in the globalPredictOptions.Images— the image↔message association is lost on the wire. -
In
backend/python/sglang/backend.py,_messages_to_dicts()builds{"role": …, "content": msg.content or ""}and_build_prompt()renders that throughapply_chat_template(). For a Qwen3.5-VL model the rendered prompt therefore contains no<|vision_start|><|image_pad|><|vision_end|>. -
The images themselves are forwarded correctly —
backend.pydoesimage_data = list(request.Images)→llm.async_generate(..., image_data=image_data). But sglang's multimodal processor locates images by scanning the prompt for the model's image token (sglang/srt/multimodal/processors/qwen_vl.py:image_token="<|vision_start|><|image_pad|><|vision_end|>"plus the matching regex). With no placeholder present nothing is split out andimage_datais discarded without a message.
backend/python/vllm/backend.py has the identical gap: its _messages_to_dicts() is the same string-content version and apply_chat_template() is applied the same way. Its load_image() / multi_modal_data / LimitImagePerPrompt machinery only carries the pixels, not the placeholder.
Rendering the model's own chat template confirms the mechanism directly (Qwen3.5-VL template, jinja2, no model load):
| message content | rendered user turn |
|---|---|
"Wie hoch steht das Wasser?" (what the backend builds today) |
<|im_start|>user\nWie hoch steht das Wasser?<|im_end|> — no placeholder |
[{"type":"image"},{"type":"text","text":"Wie hoch steht das Wasser?"}] |
<|im_start|>user\n<|vision_start|><|image_pad|><|vision_end|>Wie hoch steht das Wasser?<|im_end|> |
To Reproduce
- Serve any VLM through the sglang backend with the tokenizer template:
name: vlm
backend: cuda13-nvidia-l4t-arm64-sglang
parameters:
model: <a Qwen3.5-VL-family checkpoint>
template:
use_tokenizer_template: true
engine_args:
model_path: /models/<checkpoint>
trust_remote_code: true
POST /v1/chat/completionswith animage_urlcontent part (data URI) and a question about the image.- → the model replies that no image was attached. HTTP 200, nothing in the log.
- Control: send the same request to a standalone
python3 -m sglang.launch_serverwith the same checkpoint → correct answer about the image.
Expected behavior
The image is coupled to the prompt and the model sees it — with use_tokenizer_template: true, on the sglang and vllm backends, the same way it already works on llama-cpp.
Additional context
Two ways to fix it, and they are not mutually exclusive:
(a) Backend-local, small, no protocol change. In _build_prompt(), rebuild the OpenAI content parts for the last user message from request.Images / request.Videos before templating, so the chat template emits the model's own placeholders. The pixels keep travelling via image_data / multi_modal_data:
n_img = len(request.Images) if request.Images else 0
n_vid = len(request.Videos) if request.Videos else 0
if n_img or n_vid:
idx = next((i for i in range(len(messages_dicts) - 1, -1, -1)
if messages_dicts[i].get("role") == "user"), None)
if idx is not None:
text = messages_dicts[idx].get("content") or ""
parts = [{"type": "image"}] * n_img + [{"type": "video"}] * n_vid
if text:
parts.append({"type": "text", "text": text})
messages_dicts[idx]["content"] = parts
The existing except TypeError around apply_chat_template() needs widening to except Exception so that a text-only template falls back to string content instead of failing the request. Text-only requests are unaffected — with no images the whole path is a no-op. The same patch applies verbatim to the vllm backend. This covers every single-image and last-turn request, which is effectively all real vision traffic.
(b) Protocol-level, complete. Add repeated string images (and videos/audios) to message Message in backend.proto, stop discarding the parts in Messages.ToProto(), and let the backends read them per message. This is the only way to get multi-turn conversations with images in different turns right, and it fixes every python backend at once.
Happy to send a PR for (a) — that is the change we are running locally.
Related: #10945 (same class of failure — marker↔bitmap coupling — but on the llama-cpp/mtmd path).
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read backend/python/sglang/backend.py and backend/python/vllm/backend.py, especially _messages_to_dicts() and _build_prompt(), then inspect core/http/middleware/request.go, core/schema/message.go, and backend.proto. Reproduce the tokenizer-template request and verify that sglang and vLLM receive media placeholders coupled to the forwarded images, while text-only requests remain unaffected.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go, python
- Domain
- ai, api, backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100