Potential to make use of Swagger / OpenAPI definitions
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- SCSS
- Stars
- 116
- Forks
- 51
- Avg merge
- 1h 25m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
More and more Restful API's are making use of Swagger/OpenAPI for consuming their API Definitions. Is this something in future that you may have planned?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the current public API documentation and how its definitions are presented; no specific file, test, or entry point is named in the issue. Clarify which Swagger/OpenAPI version, endpoints, and generated or hand-written artifacts are in scope before implementation, with support for the agreed API definitions serving as the completion criterion.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- openapi
- Domain
- api, documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100