modelscope / modelscope/ms-swift
为什么seq_cls任务中，在score之后再pool，这样不是浪费推理资源吗
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
question
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 15.7k
- Forks
- 1.7k
- Avg merge
- 1d 16h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 136
Description
Checklist / 检查清单
- I have searched existing issues, and this is a new question or discussion topic. / 我已经搜索过现有的 issues，确认这是一个新的问题与讨论。
Question Description / 问题描述
为什么seq_cls任务中，在score之后再pool，这样不是浪费推理资源吗
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by locating the seq_cls scoring and pooling path, then determine whether pooling after scoring causes avoidable inference work. Done means the rationale is answered and any resulting change is clearly defined.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning, performance
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100