modelscope / modelscope/DiffSynth-Studio

I find a BUG on loss_weight.

Open
#1,148 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
13.1k
Forks
1.3k
Avg merge
13h 12m
Merged PRs (30d)
45

Description

I find loss weight become biger when time step is smaller. But flow matching method usually train more on big time step. is it a bug or you design it?

shift as 3. Red point's time index is 900, means timestep value is small because timestep is inverse sorted.
Image

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No source file, test, or entry point is identified. Start by reproducing the loss_weight versus timestep behavior described in issue #1148, checking the attached plot and the inverse-sorted timestep meaning. Done means determining whether the weighting is intentional for flow matching and, if not, defining a precise correction and regression check.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
machine-learning
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.