modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk
Track OpenSSF Scorecard security follow-ups
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
P3
T-CI
T-security
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 3.9k
- Forks
- 645
- Avg merge
- 4d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 36
Description
Context
OpenSSF Scorecard identified several follow-up opportunities while validating #1214.
Follow-up work
- Pin all GitHub Actions to immutable full commit SHAs, retaining version comments for readability — #1216
- Pin the commitlint packages installed dynamically in CI — #1217
- Establish restrictive top-level
GITHUB_TOKENpermission defaults — #1218 - Remove unnecessary
contents: writefrom the coverage job inci.yml— #1219 - Tighten
release-plz.ymlpermissions by moving write grants to job scope — #1220 - Pin the temporary release-plz fork to an immutable revision — #1221
- Add fuzzing coverage for protocol parsing/deserialization and consider continuous OSS-Fuzz integration.
The linked PRs are intentionally focused so permission and dependency changes can be reviewed independently.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file or test entry point is named. Start by locating the Rust protocol parsing and deserialization code, then identify suitable fuzz targets and assess continuous OSS-Fuzz integration. Done means fuzzing coverage is added for those paths and the OSS-Fuzz option is evaluated.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- security, testing
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100