modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/inspector
Dockerfile ENV defaults and docs/environment-variables.md can drift independently
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 10.9k
- Forks
- 1.5k
- Avg merge
- 6h 17m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 151
Description
Which version line?
v2 — current (@modelcontextprotocol/inspector@latest)
Which client?
All / shared core
Inspector version
2.7.0 (git tag) — static code-review finding, not run locally
Node version
N/A — static code review, no live run performed
Operating system (and browser, for the web client)
N/A — static code review
Transport
Not applicable / never connected
MCP server under inspection
N/A — this is a static code-review finding against the 2.7.0 tag source (Dockerfile, docs/environment-variables.md), not a live reproduction against a running MCP server.
Steps to reproduce
Found via static review of the 2.7.0 tag source, not a live run.
- The Dockerfile hardcodes CLIENT_PORT=6274, MCP_SANDBOX_PORT=6275, and MCP_APP_ORIGIN_PORT=6278 as ENV defaults.
- docs/environment-variables.md documents the same defaults separately, in prose.
- Nothing cross-checks the two the way verify-typecheck-coverage.mjs cross-checks code against a declared invariant elsewhere in the project.
I have not changed one and observed the other going stale live; flagging the absence of an enforcement mechanism between the shipped defaults and the documented ones.
Expected behavior
A script (in the same spirit as verify-typecheck-coverage.mjs) cross-checks the Dockerfile's ENV port defaults against docs/environment-variables.md and fails CI if they diverge.
Actual behavior
Nothing currently enforces that the two stay in sync; a future change to one without the other would go unnoticed until a user hits the mismatch.
Suggested fix: add a small script (run in CI) that parses both sources and asserts the default values match.
Logs, errors, or screenshots
No response
Already prototyped a fix?
No response
Before you submit
- I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate.
- This is not a security vulnerability report (those go through the private advisory process).
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read Dockerfile and docs/environment-variables.md first, then inspect verify-typecheck-coverage.mjs for the project's invariant-checking pattern. Trace how such checks are run in CI. Done means the current port defaults pass and CI fails when the Dockerfile and documentation values diverge.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- dockerfile, markdown
- Domain
- ci-cd, documentation
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 74/100