retinanet runs forever without generating I/O
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 203
- Forks
- 67
- Avg merge
- 20m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 8
Description
I am using the new_training_yamls branch. My system has 1TB of memory so it wanted me to create 8559921 files during datagen. Unfortunately the training run ran over the weekend at 100% CPU but it never finished and there was practically no I/O... not too good for a storage test.
I limited it to 100,000 files combined with --client-host-memory-in-gb 1 and it ran fairly quickly, e.g.:
781 steps completed in 91.85 s
However, bumping it up to 1,000,000 files took much more than 10x longer:
3906 steps completed in 4376.46 s
The completed runs had all zeroes as well:
[METRIC] Number of Simulated Accelerators: 4
[METRIC] Training Accelerator Utilization [AU] (%): 0.0000 (0.0000)
[METRIC] Training Throughput (samples/second): 0.0000 (0.0000)
[METRIC] Training I/O Throughput (MB/second): 0.0000 (0.0000)
[METRIC] train_au_meet_expectation: fail
So the questions I have are:
- Is this the right place to ask this question?
- Am I using the right code?
- What should I try next to make the retinanet test work?
Thanks,
Mark
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by inspecting the new_training_yamls branch and the datagen entry point for the retinanet test. Reproduce the reported runs with --client-host-memory-in-gb set to 1 and compare 100,000 versus 1,000,000 files. Done means the run completes predictably and reports nonzero training and I/O throughput.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning, performance
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100