mlcommons / mlcommons/inference
Incentivize cooperative behavior and punish uncooperative behavior
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
postmortem 5.0
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.6k
- Forks
- 650
- Avg merge
- 1d 22h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 6
Description
How do we incentivize cooperative behavior and punish uncooperative behavior e.g.:
- A peer review performed by the next meeting: +1 point?
- A peer review not performed by the next meeting: -1 point?
Post mortem task proposed by @psyhtest
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked comment in submissions_inference_v5.0 and the post mortem context mentioned in the issue. No repository file, entry point, or test is identified; done would require an agreed incentive and consequence policy with a clear way to apply and verify it.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- developer-experience
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100