Taking into account the impact generated at the fabrication of the equipement?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 270
- Forks
- 42
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hello,
Thanks for your work.
Do you have any lead to include the impact generated at the fabrication of the equipement in the impact calculator?
Also, It could be interesting to have a multicriteria approach (water, SBeq, energy) and not only watch CO2e but that would be a real challenge.
What I would like to point out is that, for a lambda user to see only "CARBON ALREADY OFFSET BY PROVIDER" may generate a feeling that everything is under controle, so he can use extensively some cloud GPU without worrying about the environment which is from my point of view a wrong message.
--> Maybe at least a few words to give a bit of perspective to the user could help?
Thanks in advance for you interest and answer,
Best regards,
Jérémy
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file, test, or entry point is named. Start by reviewing how the impact calculator currently presents provider offsets and what inputs it supports. Clarify whether the intended scope is manufacturing impacts, additional criteria such as water and energy, explanatory wording, or all three before defining completion.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- web-dev
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100