mlco2 / mlco2/codecarbon

Test & document API usage scenarios

Open
#711 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

API
Dominant language
Python
Stars
1.9k
Forks
323
Avg merge
1d 12h
Merged PRs (30d)
12

Description

Description

In order to open the dashboard to the public, we must ensure the following user journeys are valid & documented :

  • Local usage, with data sent to the API (tested, documentation outdated)
  • Local usage, without sending data to the API (not tested, documented)
  • Remote usage, with the python tracker :
  1. Using a pre-generated config file (not tested, not documented)
  2. Using the tracker parameters (not tested, not documented)
  3. Using only env vars (not tested, not documented)
  • Remote usage, with the monitor mode with a project token / config file

A getting started is being added to the interface in @prmths128's PR : #705

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the getting-started work in PR #705 and the existing documentation for local and remote usage. Check each listed tracker, API, and monitor scenario, including configuration files, parameters, environment variables, and project tokens. Done means every scenario is tested and its documentation matches the validated behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
api, documentation, testing
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.