mitre / mitre/secure-coding-case-studies

Proposal: Case Study for CVE-2025-54416 (Command Injection in GitHub Actions CI/CD Pipelines)

Open
#65 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
No language data
Stars
11
Forks
45
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

We are proposing to write a case study on the command injection vulnerability in GitHub Actions workflows (CVE-2025-54416).

Description:

CVE-2025-54416 presents a command injection vulnerability within the tj-actions/branch-names GitHub Action. This vulnerability arises from the inadequate sanitization of attacker-controlled branch names before they are incorporated into shell commands. Consequently, an attacker could craft a malicious branch name that includes shell commands. When the workflow is executed, these commands may be unintentionally executed within the CI/CD pipeline. Successful exploitation could result in the exposure of sensitive data, including repository secrets and tokens, thereby compromising the integrity of the build environment.

Scope:

This case study will examine weaknesses in CI/CD pipelines. It will specifically explore how untrusted inputs in automated workflows can lead to command injection attacks and broader supply chain risks. The study will also analyze the root causes of these vulnerabilities, provide realistic examples of how they can be exploited, and suggest practical, systematic approaches to securing CI/CD systems.

Group Members:

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the linked GitHub advisory and the tj-actions/branch-names action, then review the proposal's scope for the case study. Cover the command-injection cause, risks from untrusted workflow inputs, realistic exploitation examples, and practical CI/CD security approaches; done means a complete case study addressing those points.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
github-actions
Domain
ci-cd, documentation, security
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.