mitchelloharawild / mitchelloharawild/vecvec

A getter/setter method for @x

Open
#17 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
R
Stars
4
Forks
0
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Low priority because <vecvec>@x and <vecvec>@x<-value works.

Something like levels and levels<- would be nice, but I'm not sure if the name should be levels, vectors, or something else.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the existing @x and @x<-value access patterns. Agree with maintainers whether the public names should be levels, vectors, or another choice, then add the corresponding getter and setter and verify that they read and update @x consistently.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
r
Domain
data
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
45/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.