microsoft / microsoft/win-dev-skills

Tracking: Address feedback from joefinapps.com blog on building Fluent Icon Finder

Open
#97 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

enhancement
Dominant language
C#
Stars
444
Forks
33
Avg merge
2h 59m
Merged PRs (30d)
11

Description

Background

Joe Finney used the winui skill (in autopilot mode) to build TheJoeFin/Win-Icon-Finder — a Fluent icon similarity search app — and wrote up the experience in Building Fluent Icon Finder with the WinUI Copilot skill.

His overall verdict: "I highly recommend it!" The core feature work came out well — the agent independently arrived at a non-trivial matching pipeline (Win2D pre-render at 64×64 → L2-normalized grayscale vectors → cosine similarity → binary cache for fast subsequent launches), and MVVM structure landed cleanly.

But the post identifies five concrete, actionable gaps in the operational layer — scaffolding, packaging, CI, signing, and code style — that we should close. This is the umbrella tracking issue for those gaps.

Sub-issues

  • #98 — winui-packaging: add production signing & distribution guidance (Azure Trusted Signing, .appinstaller, EV/OV certs) — highest impact
  • #99 — winui-packaging: ship a tested GitHub Actions workflow file instead of an inline YAML snippet
  • #100 — winui-dev-workflow: generate a .slnx solution file during greenfield scaffold
  • #101 — winui-dev-workflow + analyzer: set <RuntimeIdentifiers> for multi-arch packaging by default
  • #102 — winui-dev-workflow + winui-code-review: seed canonical .editorconfig and run style polish pass on greenfield apps

Cross-cutting themes

These aren't standalone work items, but they're the pattern behind why these gaps exist:

  1. The shipping story is the gap. Agents nail the code; humans still own the ship. The highest-leverage single investment we can make is closing dotnet new → signed, installable, updatable artifact end-to-end. (Drives #98.)
  2. Every snippet we tell the agent to emit should be a real, tested file in this repo. The CI YAML failure is a foot-gun caused by ungrounded inline prose. If it lives as a file exercised by CI, it can't rot. (Drives #99; pattern applies more broadly.)
  3. Greenfield needs an explicit polish phase. Most gaps below cluster around "the moment after first build." A single greenfield-only step that drops in .slnx, .editorconfig, <RuntimeIdentifiers>, and runs a style autofix would solve #100, #101, and #102 together. Worth considering whether to implement them separately or as one unified post-scaffold step.

Original post

https://joefinapps.com/2026/05/25/building-fluent-icon-finder-with-the-winui-copilot-skill/

Reference repository

https://github.com/TheJoeFin/Win-Icon-Finder

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Joe Finney for the detailed, candid write-up — exactly the kind of preview feedback that lets us prioritize correctly.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with sub-issues #98–#102 and inspect the referenced winui-packaging, winui-dev-workflow, and winui-code-review skills. Review the original blog post and reference repository for the operational gaps. Done means the five concrete gaps have been addressed, including tested workflow and packaging guidance, with the tracking checklist updated.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
azure, csharp, github-actions
Domain
build-system, developer-experience, devops, release, tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.