microsoft / microsoft/typespec

Consider creating separate C# decorator package to avoid dependency issues

Open
#8,984 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
emitter:client:csharp
Dominant language
Java
Stars
5.9k
Forks
394
Avg merge
1d 23h
Merged PRs (30d)
104

Description

With the new dynamicModel decorator, if we start adding this to Azure specs, we will need to make the rest specs repo depend on the unbranded emitter. This means we would need to upgrade the unbranded emitter as soon as a new TypeSpec version is released which would vastly accelerate our current SLA. An alternative would be to have a separate package that holds any decorators that we are shipping as this would be much easier to upgrade.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.