microsoft / microsoft/typespec
Unnamed union with named members on the model level
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 5.9k
- Forks
- 394
- Avg merge
- 1d 23h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 104
Description
### Clear and concise description of the problem
Problem as stated in https://github.com/microsoft/typespec/discussions/7124
Scenario: model foo has a property bar and one of 2 properties baz and fox.
Potential modelling (or any equivalent that would allow anonymous reference to baz_or_fox where the union properties are named but are directly placed in foo):
```
model foo {
bar: uint32;
...baz_or_fox;
}
union baz_or_fox {
baz: uint32;
fox: uint32;
}
```
Currently it throws "Cannot spread properties of non-model type.".
### Checklist
- [x] Follow our [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/microsoft/typespec/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
- [x] Read the [docs](https://typespec.io/docs/).
- [x] Check that there isn't already an issue that request the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.