microsoft / microsoft/semantic-kernel
New Feature: Why Milvus connector not impl VectorStore?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 28.6k
- Forks
- 4.8k
- Avg merge
- 14h 13m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 18
Description
name: Feature request
about: Suggest an idea for this project
The Postgres,QdrantVectorStore ,RedisVectorStore any other is impl abstrat class VectorStore.
Why Milvus connector not impl VectorStore? is IMemoryStore
Any plan change Milvus connector to impl VectorStore?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the Milvus connector and comparing its current IMemoryStore integration with the VectorStore abstraction used by the Postgres, QdrantVectorStore, and RedisVectorStore connectors. Determine whether changing the connector is intended and what compatibility or migration requirements apply. Done requires a decided scope for VectorStore support and corresponding implementation guidance or acceptance criteria.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- csharp
- Domain
- databases
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100