microsoft / microsoft/mu_basecore

[Feature]: Verify FTW Test Results

Open
#1,090 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

state:backlog state:needs-owner state:needs-triage type:feature-request urgency:low
Dominant language
C
Stars
290
Forks
187
Avg merge
1d 7h
Merged PRs (30d)
37

Description

Feature Overview

Run tests to perform the following scenarios are handled correctly:

  • Corrupt NVStore FV Header Zero Vector and Verify Recovery and Reboot
  • Corrupt NVStore FV Header FS GUID and Verify Recovery and Reboot
  • Corrupt NVStore FV Header FV Length and Verify Recovery and Reboot
  • Corrupt NVStore FV Header Signature and Verify Recovery and Reboot
  • Corrupt NVStore FV Header Checksum and Verify Recovery and Reboot
  • Corrupt NVStore FV Header Blockmap0 and Verify Recovery and Reboot
  • Corrupt NVStore FV Header Blockmap1 and Verify Recovery and Reboot
  • Corrupt NVStore Varstore Header Signature Guid and Verify Recovery and Reboot
  • Corrupt NVStore Varstore Header Size Field and Verify Recovery and Reboot
  • Corrupt NVStore Varstore Header Format Field and Verify Recovery and Reboot
  • Corrupt NVStore Varstore Header Health Field and Verify Recovery and Reboot
Solution Overview

Verify via unit tests and/or a virtual platform like Q35.

Alternatives Considered

No response

Urgency

Low

Are you going to implement the feature request?

Someone else needs to implement the feature

Do you need maintainer feedback?

No maintainer feedback needed

Anything else?

No response

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating existing FTW and NVStore test coverage and the Q35 virtual-platform support, then determine how unit tests can corrupt each listed header field. Done means every corruption scenario verifies recovery and reboot behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
c
Domain
embedded-iot, testing-qa
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.