microsoft / microsoft/language-server-protocol
didSave without didOpen
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 13k
- Forks
- 1k
- Avg merge
- 6d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
In #1220 it has been clarified, that didChange requires a client to take ownership with didOpen. However it was never answered, whether the same applies to didSave. Could this be clarified as well?
Also, if didSave can happen without didOpen how is it possible to obtain the TextDocumentItem to which the notification relates.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading issue #1220 and the protocol definitions for didOpen and didSave. Compare their ownership and document-reference requirements, then clarify whether didSave is valid without didOpen and how its related TextDocumentItem is obtained. Done means the specification answers both questions unambiguously.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- api, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 32/100