microsoft / microsoft/igvm

igvm: meta tracking issue for CoRIM support

Open
#115 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Rust
Stars
155
Forks
42
Avg merge
23h 53m
Merged PRs (30d)
3

Description

There's more work to do for CoRIM support than just defining the header in igvm. This issue tracks the overall workstream and remaining work to do, to be updated as we discover more things required.

  1. igvm_defs and basic support for corim documents and signatures: #99
  2. CBOR validation of payload and spec compliance with each given platform. This should also update the docs with links to public documentation for each platform's CoRIM type.
  3. Figure out how to implement measurement generation and corim header generation as part of the core igvm crate. This may be tricky as there may be additional things that consumers need to add to the corim, on top of the platform required ones. At a minimum, the serialize/file builder api may need to move towards a mode where you can dynamically add headers at runtime, that will then get checked to make sure they are valid with the other headers in the file.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the igvm_defs and basic CoRIM support in #99, then map the remaining work across CBOR validation, platform-specific compliance and documentation. The core igvm crate and its serialize/file builder API are the stated entry points for measurement and header generation. Done means the remaining validation, documentation and generation work is defined and implemented, including compatible runtime header handling.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
security
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.