microsoft / microsoft/hve-core
Enhancement: Build Handoff Orchestration Agent to accelerate transition documentation using existing skills and guided Q&A
@WilliamBerryiii is already working on this.
Since Jul 3, 2026.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.5k
- Forks
- 301
- Avg merge
- 3d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 92
Description
Summary
Introduce a Handoff Orchestration Agent that coordinates existing handoff skills, prompts, and templates with guided user questions to generate high-quality handoff and transition documentation faster and more consistently.
Problem statement
Creating transition documentation currently requires manual coordination across multiple components. Contributors must discover and sequence the right artifacts themselves, which increases cycle time, creates inconsistency, and leads to avoidable review churn.
Existing capabilities and gap analysis
What exists today
- The repository already contains handoff-related agents, instructions, prompts, and skills that support pieces of transition-document generation.
- Contributors can manually combine these components to produce handoff artifacts.
What is missing
- No single orchestration agent that dynamically selects and sequences existing capabilities end-to-end from one user request.
- No unified guided Q&A flow that fills missing context and then routes to the right capability chain automatically.
- No consistent iterative regeneration loop that preserves context and quickly updates outputs after reviewer feedback.
Why this is not a duplicate
- This proposal does not replace existing skills, templates, or handoff assets.
- It adds orchestration logic across existing components to reduce manual assembly and speed up handoff/transition documentation generation.
Current behavior
- A contributor identifies a handoff or transition need.
- The contributor manually finds relevant prompts, instructions, templates, and skills.
- The contributor manually sequences these pieces and fills context gaps ad hoc.
- Output quality varies based on individual familiarity with the repository structure.
- Reviewer feedback often requires multiple manual rewrite cycles.
Expected behavior
- A contributor starts from one orchestration-agent entry point.
- The agent asks targeted, adaptive questions to gather missing context.
- The agent selects and sequences existing skills/templates automatically.
- The agent generates structured handoff artifacts with consistent quality checks.
- The contributor can regenerate quickly after feedback without rebuilding context from scratch.
Proposed enhancement
Build an orchestration agent that:
- Accepts intents such as handoff package, onboarding brief, transition runbook, or architecture handoff.
- Uses guided Q&A to detect missing information and collect it efficiently.
- Reuses existing handoff skills, templates, prompts, and instructions rather than duplicating logic.
- Produces consistent outputs aligned with existing repository standards.
- Supports iterative refinement loops with context preservation.
Scope
In scope:
- Orchestration over existing handoff capabilities.
- Guided question flow and routing logic.
- Structured artifact generation and regeneration.
Out of scope:
- Replacing existing handoff skills/templates.
- Introducing unrelated workflow domains.
Why this is useful to most users
- Reduces onboarding friction for contributors who are not deeply familiar with all handoff assets.
- Improves consistency and quality across handoff outputs.
- Reduces review churn and accelerates transition-document delivery.
- Scales better as the repository grows and capability discovery becomes more complex.
Alternatives considered
- Keep current manual composition workflow.
- Expand documentation only without orchestration.
Acceptance criteria
- A single orchestration-agent flow exists for handoff/transition documentation requests.
- The flow uses guided questions and routes to existing skills/templates.
- Generated artifacts are consistently structured and easier to review.
- Regeneration after feedback preserves context and requires fewer manual steps.
Success metrics
- Reduced time to first usable handoff draft.
- Fewer revision rounds per handoff artifact.
- Increased contributor confidence/satisfaction in handoff workflows.
- Higher consistency in final handoff package quality.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.