microsoft / microsoft/foldingdiff
BERT or Transformer?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 568
- Forks
- 74
- Avg merge
- 20h 2m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Hi Kevin,
Thank you for the impressive work!
In section 3.3, it says "a vanilla bidirectional transformer architecture" is adopted with a citation to the origin transformer paper. Also in Appendix C2, "an auto-regressive transformer" is used as a baseline.
I am quite confused since it looks like the implementation uses a BERT architecture (for both the main model and the autoregressive baseline). I am wondering whether the implementation or the preprint has been updated.
Best,
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Compare the architecture described in section 3.3 and Appendix C2 with the implementation notebooks or entry points in the repository. Verify whether the implementation uses BERT for the main model and autoregressive baseline, then clarify which source is current and update the preprint or implementation description accordingly.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- jupyter-notebook
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100