microsoft / microsoft/finops-toolkit

[Hubs] Realized recommendation savings

Open
#1,075 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Tool: FinOps hubs Type: Feature 💎
Dominant language
PowerShell
Stars
603
Forks
248
Avg merge
7d 11h
Merged PRs (30d)
11

Description

Customer Challenge:

A customer is struggling to accurately calculate cost savings from their cost optimization initiatives at the billing account level. They have a small team dedicated to various optimization tasks, such as right-sizing, storage optimization, and purchasing reservations and savings plans. The challenge is to provide detailed savings data per month, quarter, and year for each of their 20 billing profiles. The current tools, like Azure Advisor Cost Optimization Score, do not offer the granularity needed, and accumulating these numbers is complex due to the evolving infrastructure.

Proposed Solutions and Suggestions:

  1. Tracking Implemented Recommendations:

    • Approach: Identify which specific recommendations were implemented by either noting when recommendations disappear from the system (risky to assume) or by logging remediation actions.
    • Drawback: This requires historical data, which is not directly available via Azure Advisor recommendations, making it challenging to accurately track and verify the implementation of recommendations over time.
  2. Calculating Savings:

    • Approach: Compute the savings by comparing the costs of the remediated resources from one month ago to the present. For reservation recommendations, compare the overall effective cost of the reserved SKU, considering the same usage quantities, from one month ago to today.
    • Drawback: Accumulating realized savings from both reservations and savings plans can be complex. Additionally, calculating these savings at the billing profile level must account for the elasticity of a dynamically evolving infrastructure, such as autoscaling databases and compute clusters.
  3. Scoping Savings to Billing Profiles:

    • Approach: Determine the billing profile scope of the remediation by examining the billing data, as each billing line in the cost details contains the billing profile ID.
    • Drawback: While this method can help scope realized savings to specific billing profiles, it may still be challenging to accurately calculate savings due to the dynamic nature of the infrastructure.

Discussion Points:

  • How can we best integrate these solutions into the existing FinOps toolkit?
  • What new features might need to be developed to support this functionality?
  • Are there any additional suggestions or feedback from the community on how to approach this challenge?

Originally posted by @GregorWohlfarter in https://github.com/microsoft/finops-toolkit/discussions/1064

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the original Discussion #1064 and review the three proposed approaches in this issue: tracking implemented recommendations, calculating savings, and scoping them to billing profiles. Define the required functionality and success criteria for monthly, quarterly, and yearly realized-savings data before identifying implementation and validation work in the FinOps toolkit.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
azure
Domain
analytics, cloud
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.