microsoft / microsoft/fabricnotes
Fabric Licensing - F SKU with F64 Minimum for some stuff - P1 going Away
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- CSS
- Stars
- 118
- Forks
- 31
- Avg merge
- 4d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
What concept do you need more clarity on?
MS is deprecating the P1 License that allowed for "full" Fabric features and "free fabric viewers" for things with a Capacity. F SKUs don't have all the features till you get an F64 to make feature the same as a P1. Many have said MS Documentation on this is still confusing as far what you get for a lower F SKU. There is also confusion on dedicated vs Pay As you Go
Several of us thought the Fabric Notes may be a good option for improve and clarify things.
Any reference explaining that concept
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/enterprise/licenses
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/microsoft-fabric/
Have you checked the list of issues to see if there is a similar suggestion?
- [X ] Yes, I have checked (please check this box)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by comparing the Microsoft Fabric licensing and Azure pricing pages linked in the issue, then review the existing Fabric Notes content. Done means documenting the F SKU limitations, the F64 minimum for feature parity with P1, and the difference between dedicated and Pay As You Go capacity.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- azure
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100