question regarding the sequence lengths
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 96
- Forks
- 23
- Avg merge
- 17d 23h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
The idea of this work is intriguing. But the settings regarding the sequence lengths in the paper is confusing...
In Sec.2, "During inference, we enumerate all possible spans that are less than the length of L"
In A. 3, "In our experiments, we set the maximum sequence length L to 256"
In A. 4, "For all experiments, we ignore sentence boundaries, and tokenize and split text into sequences with a stride of 16... with the maximum token length of N = 128...The maximum token length for entity spans is set to 30."
- Will the setting ignoring sentence boundaries break entity spans (one entity span is split into two sequences)?
- If the max token length is 128, a max span length of 256 (L<N) is redundant, right?
- What's the difference between "maximum token length for entity spans" and "maximum sequence length L"?
I'd appreciate it if you could address these questions.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No repository files or tests are identified in the issue. Start by reviewing Sections 2, A.3, and A.4 of the paper, then document clear answers about sequence boundaries, maximum sequence length, and entity-span length; done means the three questions are resolved in the issue or supporting documentation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100