microsoft / microsoft/automatic-graph-layout
Two recommended features
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 1.5k
- Forks
- 319
- Avg merge
- 38m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
In the types of graphs I am creating, links can be 'explanations' they link a hypothesis to a conclusion. The arrowhead is at the conclusion node. Some of the links though should be bidirectional (arrowheads in both directions, for instance if two hypotheses contradict each other). I don't see a way to do that with your API
Also, some explanations link more than one hypothesis to evidence. For instance
hypothesis 1 might be - Living creatures have a high rate of population increase
hypothesis 2 might be - Food for living creatures has a low rate of increase
Conclusion might be - Living things are in a struggle for existence against each other.
In that case, it might be nice to have a big circle appear around the two nodes that work together to arrive at the conclusion, so if A and B together result in C, then A and B could be in an ellipse that contains both nodes.
Thanks.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the graph API entry point and the existing graph layout and viewing behavior. Define how bidirectional links and multi-node explanatory groups should be represented and rendered, then verify that both requested feature cases work without disrupting existing graphs.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- csharp
- Domain
- computer-graphics
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100