Variable values under ground?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1k
- Forks
- 174
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi, among the variables used to train Aurora, some atmospheric variables are defined on pressure levels. However, over certain regions, such as the Himalayas, some of these pressure levels (e.g., 700 hPa) are below the surface and therefore are not expected to have valid values. How were subsurface values handled during training?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file, test, or entry point is named. Start by tracing the training data preparation for pressure-level atmospheric variables and determine how subsurface values are handled. Done means the handling is established from the implementation or training configuration and clearly explained in the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100