Using Aurora model for prediction for a specific location
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1k
- Forks
- 174
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I am working on adapting Aurora for station-level prediction, where the target corresponds to a single fixed geographic location (one longitude/latitude pair).
Since Aurora applies spatial patching in the encoder, I was wondering:
- Is it supported to run the model using inputs corresponding to only a single grid cell (i.e., one lon/lat pair)?
- Or does the patching mechanism impose a minimum spatial resolution / minimum grid size that must be provided as input?
More specifically, is there a required minimum spatial extent (e.g., H*W grid) for the encoder to function correctly, even if the prediction target is a single station?
Any guidance on the recommended setup for station-level or point-based prediction would be greatly appreciated.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files or tests are named. Start by tracing the encoder's spatial patching and the input-shape handling, then check whether single-cell inputs are accepted. Done means establishing the minimum H*W grid requirements and documenting or implementing the recommended setup for station-level prediction.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100