[perf-scan] 2026-09-18 -- no issues found
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 3.8k
- Forks
- 362
- Avg merge
- 1d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 132
Description
Performance Scan - 2026-09-18
Automated scan of src/apm_cli/ for algorithmic performance anti-patterns.
No confirmed findings.
Scan coverage
- src/apm_cli/ (484 files scanned)
- Patterns checked: A (quadratic loops), B (linear scan in loop),
C (unconditional expensive ops), D (redundant config parsing),
E (heavy top-level imports), F (sequential independent I/O)
Notes
Candidate matches were reviewed across all six patterns and discarded as
false positives:
- Pattern A: high for-loop-count files (uninstall/engine.py,
hook_integrator.py, context_optimizer.py, plugin_parser.py) contain
nested loops, but each operates on small, bounded, per-package or
per-directory collections (candidate placements, hook events, plugin
skill dirs) with pre-built dict/set indexes (_build_children_index,
exact_index/plugin_index in _resolve_marketplace_packages, pool dict
in hook_ownership.reinject_apm_source_from_sidecar) already used to
avoid O(n^2) scans. - Pattern B:
if x in dict/setmembership checks found throughout
install/, deps/, and commands/ are already against pre-built
sets/dicts (seen_keys, locked_keys, allowed_hosts, exact_index), not
raw lists. - Pattern C: os.walk/glob calls (deployable_source_plan.py,
plugin_parser.py, policy/discovery.py) run once per package/scan
invocation, not in a per-item hot loop. - Pattern D: script_runner.py's
_load_config()and registry/
operations.py's repeatedos.getenv()calls are called at most a
handful of times per command invocation, not in a per-dependency loop. - Pattern E: CLI command modules (install.py, audit.py, etc.) already
defer heavy subsystem imports to function scope; only lightweight
stdlib/click imports remain at module level. - Pattern F: subprocess.run calls inside loops (bare_cache.py,
github_downloader.py) are sequential git config/fetch/checkout steps
with a data dependency (fetch must precede checkout), not
independent per-package I/O; parallel download phases already use
ThreadPoolExecutor (install/phases/download.py, deps/apm_resolver.py,
deps/revision_pins.py, registry/operations.py).
All hot-path code reviewed uses appropriate data structures and caching.
Generated by Daily Performance Scanner · copilot · auto · 103.2 AIC · ⌖ 4.67 AIC · ⊞ 9.7K · ◷
- expires on Sep 25, 2026, 1:36 AM UTC
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
This issue records an automated scan of src/apm_cli/ and reports no confirmed findings. The listed files and patterns were reviewed and dismissed, so there is no entry point or concrete change to start from. A maintainer would need to identify an actionable performance problem before work can be considered done.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 10/100