[perf-scan] 2026-09-15 -- performance opportunities found
Open
@sergio-sisternes-epam is already working on this.
Since Sep 15, 2026.
status/accepted
type/automation
type/performance
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 3.9k
- Forks
- 365
- Avg merge
- 1d 17h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 132
Description
Performance Scan - 2026-09-15
Automated scan of src/apm_cli/ for algorithmic performance anti-patterns.
1 finding identified.
Findings
[F] Sequential independent I/O -- src/apm_cli/registry/operations.py:292-310
- Current: O(n) sequential registry HTTP round-trips --
batch_fetch_server_info
loops overserver_referencesand calls
self.registry_client.find_server_by_reference(server_ref)once per
iteration, with no data dependency between iterations. Each call performs
its ownsearch_servers()+get_server()network request, so wall time
grows linearly with server count. The sibling method
check_servers_needing_installation(same class, lines 40-104) already
solves the identical fan-out with a boundedThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=4),
confirming this is an established, applicable pattern in this file. - Proposed: O(n/max_workers) wall time using the same bounded
ThreadPoolExecutorapproach already used a few dozen lines above in the
same class. - Fix: Wrap the
for server_ref in server_references:loop body in a
ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=4)and useexecutor.mapto fetch each
server's info concurrently, mirroringcheck_servers_needing_installation's
_check_onepattern, then populateserver_info_cachefrom the results.
Scan coverage
- src/apm_cli/ (484 files scanned)
- Patterns checked: A (quadratic loops), B (linear scan in loop),
C (unconditional expensive ops), D (redundant config parsing),
E (heavy top-level imports), F (sequential independent I/O)
Generated by Daily Performance Scanner · copilot · auto · 112.2 AIC · ⌖ 6.03 AIC · ⊞ 10.1K · ◷
- expires on Sep 22, 2026, 1:38 AM UTC
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.