microsoft / microsoft/api-guidelines
Feature request: clearer (semantic?) versioning; version tags
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 23.3k
- Forks
- 2.7k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Given section 4.2, "Guidelines for existing services and versioning of services"
We do not recommend making a breaking change to a service that pre-dates these guidelines simply for compliance sake. The service SHOULD try to become compliant at the next version release when compatibility is being broken anyway. When a service adds a new API, that API SHOULD be consistent with the other APIs of the same version. So if a service was written against version 1.0 of the guidelines, new APIs added incrementally to the service SHOULD also follow version 1.0. The service can then upgrade to align with the latest version of the guidelines at the service's next major release.
I expected to find a tag that would allow me to link to the (presumably stable) 2.2 version, but it looks like Guidelines.md was created at version 2.3 and that version 2.3 is still a work in progress. It would be nice if there was a tagged, stable version one could link to.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with Guidelines.md section 4.2 and inspect the repository's existing Git tags and version references for 2.2 and 2.3. Determine the stable-tag convention, then verify that a link to the stable 2.2 version resolves and remains distinct from the work-in-progress version.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- git, github
- Domain
- documentation, release
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100