microsoft / microsoft/api-guidelines
Invalid Examples of group versioning table markdown
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 23.3k
- Forks
- 2.7k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I think it should look like that (according to the table below with Version Format | Example | Interpretation headers), but I'd like to get a confirmation regarding that.
12.1.1.1 Examples of group versioning
| Group | Major.Minor |
|---|---|
| 1.0 | |
| 1.1 | |
| 2012-12-01 | 1.2 |
| 1.0 | |
| 2.0 | |
| 3.0 | |
| 3.1 | |
| 3.2 | |
| 2013-03-21 | 3.3 |
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Open Guidelines.md at section 12.1.1.1, linked in the issue, and compare the group-versioning table with the surrounding Version Format, Example, and Interpretation material. Correct the table markdown if the proposed structure is confirmed, and consider the work done when the section renders as a valid table matching the documented examples.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- markdown
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100