Confusing error on computed name class member

### 🔎 Search Terms

late bindable computed symbol class member

### 🕗 Version & Regression Information

- This is the behavior in every version I tried

### ⏯ Playground Link

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?target=99&lib=lib.esnext.d.ts&ts=5.9.0-dev.20250326#code/MYewdgzgLgBArmAlgRzgUwMoE8C2AjEAGwAYYBeGbfIgOgDMQAnACgCJWBKAbgCge6EwKInAwA5migBVJKky4CJZhwBcMKFgAOaEHXiz0VRaQDePGDEaS4jMPpSGFRYrwC+fYIQCGECDADChBAAzDBmFgDaEtIG8tRKHAC65DCsdIiM0KxuPEA

### 💻 Code

```ts
const uniqueSymbol0 = Symbol.for("");

function getUniqueSymbol0(): typeof uniqueSymbol0 {
return uniqueSymbol0;
}

class Cls3 {
[getUniqueSymbol0()] = "first"; // A computed property name in a class property declaration must have a simple literal type or a 'unique symbol' type.(1166)
}
```

### 🙁 Actual behavior

The error is confusing because this expression has a `unique symbol` type already

### 🙂 Expected behavior

This error should mention more accurate late-bindable requirements. From the source code:
```ts
/**
* Indicates whether a declaration name is definitely late-bindable.
* A declaration name is only late-bindable if:
* - It is a `ComputedPropertyName`.
* - Its expression is an `Identifier` or either a `PropertyAccessExpression` an
* `ElementAccessExpression` consisting only of these same three types of nodes.
* - The type of its expression is a string or numeric literal type, or is a `unique symbol` type.
*/
```

### Additional information about the issue

_No response_

Start with the linked TypeScript Playground example and the source comment describing definitely late-bindable declaration names. Trace the diagnostic for the computed class property and make its wording reflect the stated expression and type requirements; verify that the example reports the more accurate error.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.