microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Inconsistency between element access and object destruction
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Avg merge
- 1d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 117
Description
🔎 Search Terms
destruct object
🕗 Version & Regression Information
Before v4.4.4, index expression in element access was also not inferred as const. So this issue starts from v4.4.4. Reproducible in Nightly build.
⏯ Playground Link
💻 Code
let n = 1 as const
const o = { a1: "abcd" }
const x = o[`a${n}`]
// ^? : string
const { [`a${n}`]: y } = o
// ^? Errors: Type '{ a1: string; }' has no matching index signature for type 'string'.(2537)
🙁 Actual behavior
`a${n}` in object destruction not inferred as const ("a1")
🙂 Expected behavior
`a${n}` in object destruction should be inferred as "a1", just like the one in element access.
Additional information about the issue
A possible workaround is to add as const after `a${n}`. I think the main problem is the inconsistency between element access and object destruction, which is confusing.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked TypeScript Playground reproduction and compare the inferred type for the computed element access with the computed object-destructuring key. Trace the type-checking path for these two forms and make destructuring infer "a1" consistently; done when the example accepts the destructuring and reports the expected key type without the workaround.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100