microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Nested Promise not automatically unwrapped
@rbuckton is already working on this.
Since Jul 5, 2024.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Avg merge
- 1d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 117
Description
🔎 Search Terms
return type promise union
🕗 Version & Regression Information
This is the behavior in every version I tried, and I reviewed the FAQ for entries about Promise
⏯ Playground Link
💻 Code
type SomeNode = string | Promise<string>
async function renderChild(): Promise<SomeNode> {
return Promise.resolve("test")
}
function renderApp(children: SomeNode) {
}
// Should typecheck but errors:
// Type 'Promise<string>' is not assignable to type 'string'.(2345)
renderApp(renderChild())
// ^?
🙁 Actual behavior
Argument of type 'Promise<SomeNode>' is not assignable to parameter of type 'SomeNode'.
Type 'Promise<SomeNode>' is not assignable to type 'Promise<string>'.
Type 'SomeNode' is not assignable to type 'string'.
Type 'Promise<string>' is not assignable to type 'string'.(2345)
input.tsx(13, 11): Did you forget to use 'await'?
🙂 Expected behavior
No typechecking error
Additional information about the issue
Nodes in React are typed as type Node = AwaitedNodes | Promise<AwaitedNodes>. However, the return type of async Components is Promise<Node>. But TypeScript will not consider this a Component because Promise<Node> is not assignable to Node even though it should be since at runtime Promise<Promise<T>> will never be observable and always collapse to Promise<T>.
Users can either fix this by using an unwieldy Promise<Awaited<ReactNode>>.
We can also fix this at the type level by allowing Node | Promise<Node> as the return type. Though I suspect this just pushes the issue one Promise-wrapping level away when TypeScript could collapse wrapped Promises automatically.
Original issue: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/67365
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.