microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
[API] Ability to check if a parameter is being passed to const type parameter
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Avg merge
- 1d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 117
Description
🔍 Search Terms
const type parameter
✅ Viability Checklist
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- This isn't a request to add a new utility type: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/No-New-Utility-Types
- This feature would agree with the rest of our Design Goals: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Design-Goals
⭐ Suggestion
Hi from ts-api-utils.
We'd like to be able to check if an expression, passed as an argument of a call expression, is in a "const context". Checking for as const is fairly trivial as we can just search up the syntax tree, but checking for const type parameters seems impossible without using TypeScript internals.
With code examples:
We can currently check if foo is in a "const context" here fairly trivially:
const test1 = { foo: 1 } as const;
But can't do the same for foo in this example:
declare const fn: <const A>(param: A) => unknown;
const test2 = fn({ foo: 2 });
Proposal
Ideally, we would like an officially supported way to make such a check.
We currently have a PR in progress that works using ts internals, but we'd prefer not to rely on ts internals.
📃 Motivating Example
N/A
💻 Use Cases
-
What do you want to use this for?
determining whether a type is readonly
https://github.com/eslint-functional/eslint-plugin-functional/issues/827 -
What shortcomings exist with current approaches?
There doesn't seem to be anyway official way to do this -
What workarounds are you using in the meantime?
Use ts internals
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the const type parameter example and reviewing the TypeScript compiler API and the existing internal approach used by ts-api-utils PR #519. Done means an officially supported API can determine whether an argument expression is in a const context, including the readonly-type use case, without relying on TypeScript internals.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100