microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Allow instantion expression with empty arguments
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Avg merge
- 1d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 117
Description
🔍 Search Terms
instantiation expression, empty, type arguments
✅ Viability Checklist
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- This isn't a request to add a new utility type: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/No-New-Utility-Types
- This feature would agree with the rest of our Design Goals: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Design-Goals
⭐ Suggestion
I would like to be able to instantiate a generic function type with an empty type arguments list.
It would be nice to allow this for generic types, but it's not as necessary, since a generic type is always instantiated in a type context, even if no type arguments list is given. A generic function type needs to be specifically instantiated.
📃 Motivating Example
Here is a generic function where a type parameter has a default. I can get use an instantiation expression to specialize it to a non-generic function.
declare function find1<T, S extends T=T>(Ar:T[], predicate:(t:T)=>t is S): S | undefined;
type Find1Object = typeof find1<object>;
Here is a generic function with only one type parameter. I cannot use an instantiation expression with the default for S:
declare function find2<S extends object = object>(Ar:object[], predicate:(t:object)=>t is S) : S | undefined;
type Find2 = typeof find2<>; // <- this is a syntax error "Type argument list cannot be empty"
💻 Use Cases
- What do you want to use this for?
- What shortcomings exist with current approaches?
- What workarounds are you using in the meantime?
- Declare an unused "dummy" type parameter so there's always a non-defaulted type argument.
Originally mentioned here: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/57463#issuecomment-1957739330
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files or tests; start by locating the parser and type-checking paths for instantiation expressions and the diagnostic rejecting an empty type-argument list. Use the find2 example as the acceptance case: an empty list should be accepted and specialize the generic function using its defaults without changing emitted JavaScript.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100