microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Problem with function types, <T>() => T extends X ? () : ()
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Cursed?
Domain: check: Variance Relationships
Help Wanted
Possible Improvement
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Avg merge
- 1d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 117
Description
🔎 Search Terms
"function", "generic function"
🕗 Version & Regression Information
⏯ Playground Link
💻 Code
type Fn<X> = <T>() => T extends X ? 1 : 2
type Equals<X, Y> =
Fn<X> extends
Fn<Y> ? true : false
type A = Equals<{readonly a: 'A'}, {a: 'A'}>
🙁 Actual behavior
type A should shows true.
🙂 Expected behavior
type A should be false.
It works well when the code is like this.
type Fn1<X> = <T>() => T extends X ? 1 : 2
type Fn2<X> = <T>() => T extends X ? 1 : 2
type Equals<X, Y> =
Fn1<X> extends
Fn2<Y> ? true : false
type A = Equals<{readonly a: 'A'}, {a: 'A'}>
Additional information about the issue
No response
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked TypeScript Playground and reproduce the minimal conditional generic-function example. Compare the shared Fn alias with the separate Fn1 and Fn2 aliases to isolate why the resulting type differs. Done means type A evaluates to false while the separate-alias example retains its reported behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100