microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Allow omission of generic type if its equal to the default type
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Avg merge
- 2d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 132
Description
Search Terms
generic, default, extends, equals, =
Suggestion
Allow the syntax extends = T in generics definition in place of extends T = T.
Currently
class Foo <T extends any = any> {}
Suggestion*
class Foo <T extends= any> {}
Use Cases
The problem of having to write <T extends any = any> revealed itself when I had a bit more complex type looking like keyof NetworkTransportProtocol that looked then somehow like this:
class Foo<T extends keyof system.NetworkTransportProtocol = keyof system.NetworkTransportProtocol> {}
which just was a lot of duplicated text.
class Foo<T extends= keyof system.NetworkTransportProtocol> {}
by reducing the duplicate information the whole syntax becomes better to read.
While I did focus on the default-case for class-generics. I believe this could also help with other definitions:
function foo <T extends=any>(bar: T) {}
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue does not name implementation files or tests; start by locating TypeScript's grammar and tests for generic constraints and default types. Compare the proposed extends= syntax for class and function generics, then determine the parser and type-checking behavior required. Done would require an accepted design and passing coverage for the proposed syntax.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100