microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Add typed return for Object.defineProperties
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Avg merge
- 2d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 132
Description
Search Terms
Object.defineProperties typed
Suggestion
const newObject = Object.defineProperties(o, map);
Use Cases
Creating extensions of certain properties while still being able to type-check them
Examples
/** @type {NodeList} */
const nodeListObject = Object.defineProperties(/** @type {Node[]} */ ([]), {
item: {
enumerable: false,
/** @param {number} [index] */
value: function item(index) { return this[index]; },
},
});
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
The current type I'm using is the following:
interface ObjectConstructor {
defineProperties<T1, T2 = PropertyDescriptorMap>(o: T1, properties: T2 & ThisType<T1>): T1 & {
[K in keyof T2]: (
T2[K]['get'] extends Function ? ReturnType<T2[K]['get']> :
T2[K]['set'] extends Function ? Parameters<T2[K]['set']>[0] :
T2[K]['value'] extends undefined ? any : T2[K]['value']
)
};
}
It seems alright but I would love to get some feedback. Currently, I'm targeting against .get() first, then .set(arg0) and finally .value.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the Object.defineProperties entry point and the proposed ObjectConstructor signature. Check how the example's get, set, and value cases should produce a typed result, using the compatibility and design-goal checklist as constraints; done means the requested return typing is supported without runtime changes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript, typescript
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100