microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Stricter Assignability Checks for Overloaded Functions
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Avg merge
- 2d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 132
Description
Search Terms
function overload, assignability
Suggestion
When a function has overloads, each with a different number of arguments, subtle bugs can occur.
My suggestion is to have extra assignability checks for overloaded methods/functions.
When assigning A to B the algorithm should be,
- Is
Aassignable toBunder the existing assignability rules? - Is
Aan overloaded function/method?- If it is not, we are done.
- If it is, we need more checks,
- Does the assignable overload of
Ahave the same number of arguments asB?- If it does, we are done. (Right? Maybe?)
- If it doesn't, find all overloads of
Awith the same number of arguments asB- Is each overload assignable to
B? If it isn't, we have a compile-time error
- Is each overload assignable to
- Does the assignable overload of
Use Cases
Better type safety. I've been bitten by this behaviour regarding overloaded functions/methods in the past, with far more complicated examples. My general advice to people is to avoid overloads as much as possible/at all cost.
If this hole in the type system is fixed, I may not be so averse to overloads... Or I'll probably find something else to gripe about =x
Examples
The repro below has the following properties,
- Each overload has a different number of arguments
- Each overload has a different return type
function foo(a: number, b: symbol): string;
function foo(a: number): number;
function foo(a: number, b?: symbol): string|number {
if (b == undefined) {
return a;
} else {
return `a:${a},b:${String(b)}`;
}
}
function takesNumCallback(callback: (a: number, b: number) => number) {
const tmp = callback(1, 2);
if (typeof tmp != "number") {
throw new Error("wat");
}
console.log(1 / tmp);
}
//Allowed during compile-time
//But will throw an error during run-time
takesNumCallback(foo);
The problem here is that foo (a : number) : number is assignable to (a : number, b : number) => number, because TS assumes foo (a : number) : number will ignore the second argument (b).
However, TS is not considering the other overload that has two arguments and is expecting b : symbol.
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Well, it would break TS code for people currently using overloaded functions/methods unsafely.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked TypeScript Playground repro and the overload and assignability behavior described in the example. Done means the compiler performs the proposed checks and reports the unsafe call while preserving the stated runtime behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100