microsoft / microsoft/TypeChat
Compare to Open AI's function calling
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 8.7k
- Forks
- 414
- Avg merge
- 3h 8m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
I'm wondering how this compares to Open AI's function calling as that's also made "to more reliably get structured data back from the model."
I see that TypeChat aimes to be model-agnostic and lets me pass in TS types.
How does the quality of the answer compare? OpenAI finetuned the models to work for function calling. Are TypeChat results as reliable? Or could it be combined?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked OpenAI function-calling announcement and TypeChat’s model-agnostic TypeScript approach. Compare their reliability and possible combination using a reproducible evaluation, then report the findings and any supported integration direction; the issue names no files or tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- ai
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100