Discussion on Visual feature aggregation
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 13.7k
- Forks
- 1.3k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Thanks again for releasing the code. I was going through extract_features.py and found that to calculate the feature for a voxel, visibility of the voxel is not considered from a given camera.
Intuitively, I thought that features would be averaged only from rendered views from which a particular voxel is available. Do have any explanation why does visibility does not matter? Did you guys tried something like this before finalizing the current method?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The discussion points to dataset_toolkits/extract_feature.py around line 139. Start by reading the feature aggregation logic and the 16-comment thread to understand the current visibility assumptions and whether a change is agreed upon. There is no concrete acceptance criterion or named test, so the intended behavior must be settled before implementation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- computer-vision
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100