evaluation setting
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 13.7k
- Forks
- 1.3k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hey, I found that the metric for TRELLIS's evaluation contains FD and KD with different model. But the eval results from my eval is not match the scores reported in the paper. I wonder if you can share the CLIP score / KD / FD code used in the paper? Thanks again for the wonderful work and opening the code.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue does not name any files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating TRELLIS's evaluation implementation and comparing its FD, KD, and CLIP metric models with the paper; done means identifying the configuration or code needed to reproduce the reported scores.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100