[Bug] Colab Cell 4 Checksum failed
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 13.7k
- Forks
- 1.3k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Using https://colab.research.google.com/github/jackel27/Trellis-Colab/blob/main/Kaiser-Trellis.ipynb at Cell 4 I get
Miniconda is subject to terms of service: https://legal.anaconda.com/policies/en/#terms-of-service
⏬ Downloading https://repo.anaconda.com/miniconda/Miniconda3-py311_24.11.1-0-Linux-x86_64.sh...
AssertionError Traceback (most recent call last)
in <cell line: 0>()
8 get_ipython().system('pip install -q condacolab')
9 import condacolab
---> 10 condacolab.install_miniconda()
1 frames
/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/condacolab.py in install_from_url(installer_url, prefix, env, run_checks, sha256)
97 digest = _chunked_sha256(installer_fn)
98 assert (
---> 99 digest == sha256
100 ), f"💥💔💥 Checksum failed! Expected {sha256}, got {digest}"
101
AssertionError: 💥💔💥 Checksum failed! Expected 35a58b8961e1187e7311b979968662c6223e86e1451191bed2e67a72b6bd0658, got 807774bae6cd87132094458217ebf713df436f64779faf9bb4c3d4b6615c1e3a
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Open Kaiser-Trellis.ipynb from the linked Colab notebook and inspect Cell 4, starting with the condacolab.install_miniconda() call and its checksum values. Reproduce the download in Colab and compare the expected and received Miniconda digests. Done means Cell 4 installs successfully without a checksum assertion failure.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- jupyter-notebook, python
- Domain
- machine-learning, tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 32/100