microsoft / microsoft/TRELLIS.2
strange performance
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 11.3k
- Forks
- 1.4k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Thank you for your excellent work on this project!
However, I noticed some unusual performance from the model during my testing. Below is the test image I used:
I tested it on the Hugging Face demo with the following configuration, which resulted in poor performance:
The back and bottom of the reconstructed mesh appear empty with significant holes and damage. Could this be due to a mistake on my part during the mesh reconstruction process, or is there a special configuration required for handling this type of image?
Thank you.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the result in the Hugging Face demo with the reported test image and configuration. Inspect the mesh reconstruction process and compare the damaged back and bottom surfaces with a successful reconstruction. Done means determining whether the holes come from the configuration or from a model limitation, with reproduction details documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- huggingface, python
- Domain
- computer-graphics, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100