microsoft / microsoft/TRELLIS.2

Request for releasing the 100 AI-generated image test set or corresponding prompts used in evaluation

Open
#146 0 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
11.3k
Forks
1.4k
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Dear TRELLIS.2 authors,

First of all, thank you so much for your outstanding work and for open-sourcing the code! TRELLIS.2 is truly impressive, and we deeply appreciate the effort you have put into both the research and the release.

We noticed that in the paper, you mention using 100 AI-generated image prompts (reference [16]) for generation quality comparison and user studies, specifically to ensure training–testing disjointness. We are very interested in reproducing the evaluation results reported in the paper and conducting fair comparisons with other methods.

Could you kindly consider releasing any of the following:

The 100 AI-generated images used as input prompts in your evaluation pipeline, or
The text prompts used to generate those 100 images (so that the community can regenerate them using the same or similar tools), or
A pointer to the original source (reference [16]) where these images can be obtained, along with any preprocessing steps applied.
We understand that releasing evaluation assets may involve additional effort, and we completely respect your timeline and priorities. Even a brief clarification on whether this is planned for future release would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you again for your wonderful contribution to the community. We look forward to hearing from you!

Best regards,
Haoshu Wu

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

The issue names no repository files, tests, or entry points. Start by checking paper reference [16] and the evaluation description; done means the 100 images or their text prompts, source pointer, and preprocessing details are released, or the maintainers clarify their availability.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
data, machine-learning
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.