Verify evals on Papers with Code
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Cuda
- Stars
- 298
- Forks
- 26
- Avg merge
- 22h 44m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Hi,
Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face. Congratulations on your work!
I've made the paper and 1 paper-native evaluation available on Papers with Code.
The paper is part of the 3D semantic segmentation task page.
Would it be possible to verify these results and let me know if any score, model name, benchmark protocol, or openness metadata should be corrected?
You can also edit the task, methods, project page, and GitHub URL directly from the paper page using your Hugging Face account.
Kind regards,
Niels
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the paper and its paper-native evaluation on the linked Papers with Code pages, including the 3D semantic segmentation task page. Compare the listed scores, model name, benchmark protocol, openness metadata, methods, project page, and GitHub URL with the repository’s published information; done means reporting any corrections or confirming that the entries are accurate.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- computer-vision, documentation, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100