microsoft / microsoft/STL

P3923R0 Additional NB Comment Resolutions For Kona 2025

Open
#5,844 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

cxx26
Dominant language
C++
Stars
11.1k
Forks
1.7k
Avg merge
4d 15h
Merged PRs (30d)
22

Description

WG21-P3923R0 Additional NB Comment Resolutions For Kona 2025

No feature-test macro is mentioned.

  • Section 2.1 changes [tuple.helper].
    • We already implement this unconditionally. I believe GH_000545_include_compare would be the best place to add test coverage for this (instead of adding a whole top-level test).
  • Sections 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5 patch <hive>, which I've recorded in #5301.
  • Section 2.6 patches the parallel range algorithms, which I've recorded in #5610 (thanks @timsong-cpp).
  • Section 2.7 patches <meta>, which I've recorded in #5606.
  • Sections 2.8 and 2.9 patch std::execution, which I've recorded in #4768.
  • Section 2.10 changes [tuple.tuple.general].
    • We already strengthen noexcept here, so we just need to remove those comments from product code (and any test comments).

I'll mark this as Available as I'm willing to review a PR for sections 2.1 and 2.10 before opening up the general C++26 floodgates.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the issue's sections 2.1 and 2.10, then inspect the existing GH_000545_include_compare coverage and the tuple-related implementation and tests. Add coverage for the [tuple.helper] change, and remove the obsolete comments associated with [tuple.tuple.general] from product code and tests. Done means those two sections are addressed without opening separate work already tracked in the linked issues.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
cpp
Domain
devtools
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
42/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.