Improve test coverage of ranges::views
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 11.1k
- Forks
- 1.7k
- Avg merge
- 4d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 22
Description
In https://github.com/microsoft/STL/pull/1406#discussion_r513011605 @CaseyCarter noted that we should test the conditional noexcept clauses for the different views.
Also, we should audit the view tests for missing coverage due to the fact that test::range (as defined in tests/std/include/range_algorithm_support.hpp) always models simple-view.
As this affects all views we should do this in one consistent run
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the view tests and tests/std/include/range_algorithm_support.hpp, focusing on how test::range always models simple-view. Audit coverage for conditional noexcept clauses and non-simple-view behavior across all ranges::views tests. Done means the missing cases are covered consistently for each view.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100