Why server test results are slower than computers？
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 5k
- Forks
- 622
- Avg merge
- 8h 37m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
I tested it with a GIST data set，The size of the query vector is (1000*960)，Return 100 neighbors，The time I built the index is 20562.084 s，The query time is 35.082 s，recall is 0.92669，The time to add 100 vectors is 22.281 s. I feel this time is very long, am I using it correctly? Its index construction and query time are longer than NSG.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names a GIST dataset, a 1000×960 query-vector shape, index-build and query timings, recall, and an NSG comparison, but no source files or tests. Start by reproducing the reported benchmark and checking the index and query configuration; done means explaining whether the usage and timings are expected or identifying the configuration or performance problem.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- performance, search
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100